Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 14.05.2026 | Azam - Pamba Jiji | 2 : 0 |
| 02.03.2026 | Pamba Jiji - Azam | 2 : 2 |
| 09.02.2025 | Pamba Jiji - Azam | 1 : 0 |
| 14.09.2024 | Azam - Pamba Jiji | 0 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.08.2026 | Azam - Tabora United | 2 - 1 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | Polisi Tanzania - Azam | 1 - 1 | D |
| 30.06.2026 | Azam - Dodoma Jiji | 2 - 0 | W |
| 27.06.2026 | Coastal Union - Azam | 0 - 2 | W |
| 24.06.2026 | Young Africans - Azam | 3 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.08.2026 | Pamba Jiji - Simba | 1 - 2 | L |
| 14.08.2026 | Pamba Jiji - Dodoma Jiji | 1 - 1 | D |
| 30.06.2026 | Coastal Union - Pamba Jiji | 2 - 1 | L |
| 27.06.2026 | Pamba Jiji - JKT Tanzania | 1 - 2 | L |
| 24.06.2026 | Pamba Jiji - Mbeya City | 0 - 2 | L |
The upcoming match between Azam and Pamba Jiji is scheduled for 23.08.2026 16:00 in Ligi kuu Bara. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Azam are in position 5 with 4 points. The stored form sequence is WD. Pamba Jiji are in position 11 with 1 points. The stored form sequence is LD.
Azam recorded 8 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDWWLWWWWW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Pamba Jiji recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDLLLWLLWL. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 4 head-to-head matches, Azam recorded 1 wins, there were 2 draws, and Pamba Jiji recorded 1 wins. The average total was 1.75 goals per match. Both teams scored in 25% of those matches, while 25% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 100%; Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Azam to win with 74% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 73.61%, 18.91% and 7.48%. The model momentum difference is 66.13 points in favour of Azam. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.22 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.20%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Azam 0 / Pamba Jiji 0 supports Azam by an average 2.35 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The discipline profile for Azam at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 2 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Azam and Pamba Jiji ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 4 head-to-head meetings averaged 1.75 goals, while this match produced 3. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Azam at home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 1 yellow cards, 1 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Azam received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. The total was effectively equal to the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 100%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Azam at 0. The stored market movement was 2.35 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 2-1, the line settled as a full win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.