Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 29.07.2026 | Port FC - Persija | 2 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.09.2026 | Port FC - Lamphun Warrior | 2 - 1 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Rasi Salai United - Port FC | 1 - 2 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Persebaya Surabaya - Port FC | 2 - 1 | L |
| 29.07.2026 | Port FC - Persija | 2 - 2 | D |
| 26.07.2026 | PSMS Medan - Port FC | 0 - 2 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Persija - Persib Bandung | 2 - 1 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Pusamania Borneo - Persija | 0 - 1 | W |
| 06.08.2026 | Persija - Arema FC | 3 - 1 | W |
| 04.08.2026 | Persib Bandung - Persija | 2 - 1 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Persija - PSMS Medan | 4 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Port FC and Persija is scheduled for 29.07.2026 08:30 in Piala Presiden. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Port FC recorded 9 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWWDWWWW. The averages are 2.70 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Persija recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWLWWDWWL. The averages are 2 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Port FC and Persija ended 2-2. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.