Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - NEOM | 1 : 3 |
| 05.05.2025 | NEOM - Al-Faisaly FC | 4 : 1 |
| 06.01.2025 | Al-Faisaly FC - NEOM | 3 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - NEOM | 1 - 3 | L |
| 14.08.2026 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC - Al-Faisaly FC | 4 - 2 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Beltinci - Al-Faisaly FC | 1 - 3 | W |
| 22.07.2026 | TSC Backa Topola - Al-Faisaly FC | - | |
| 14.05.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - Al Baten | 4 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.08.2026 | Al-Faisaly FC - NEOM | 1 - 3 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | NEOM - Al-Fayha | 2 - 1 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Las Palmas - NEOM | 0 - 1 | W |
| 24.07.2026 | Orlando Pirates - NEOM | 0 - 1 | W |
| 17.07.2026 | Peterborough - NEOM | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between Al-Faisaly FC and NEOM is scheduled for 21.08.2026 18:00 in Pro League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Al-Faisaly FC are in position 14 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is L. NEOM are in position 6 with 3 points. The stored form sequence is W.
Al-Faisaly FC recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWWWWWWWW. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. NEOM recorded 5 wins, 4 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWDDLWDD. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 0.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Al-Faisaly FC recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and NEOM recorded 2 wins. The average total was 4.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%; Under 2.5 goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 11.80; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Al-Faisaly FC -1.5 / NEOM +1.5 supports Al-Faisaly FC by an average 3.46 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 77/100, 77.48% bucket win rate across 444 observations). Goals Over/Under — Under 2.5 (odds 1.90).
The match between Al-Faisaly FC and NEOM ended 0-2. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 2 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 4.67 goals, while this match produced 2. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 100%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 11.8 total corners. The match recorded 2 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 7.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 8.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Al-Faisaly FC at -1.5. The stored market movement was 3.46 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 0-2, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Under 2.5 at odds of 1.9. The actual market outcome was Under 2.5. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 15 verifiable pre-match indicators, 6 aligned with the final result and 9 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.