Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 05.04.2026 | Al Riyadh - Al Shabab | 1 : 1 |
| 23.02.2026 | Al Shabab - Al Riyadh | 3 : 1 |
| 15.05.2025 | Al Riyadh - Al Shabab | 1 : 3 |
| 15.01.2025 | Al Shabab - Al Riyadh | 2 : 1 |
| 28.10.2024 | Al Riyadh - Al Shabab | 0 : 2 |
| 03.04.2024 | Al Shabab - Al Riyadh | 1 : 0 |
| 05.10.2023 | Al Riyadh - Al Shabab | 2 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.08.2026 | Al Shabab - Al Riyadh | 3 - 3 | D |
| 22.08.2026 | Al Khaleej Saihat - Al Shabab | 0 - 0 | D |
| 16.08.2026 | Al Wehda Club - Al Shabab | 3 - 2 | L |
| 13.08.2026 | Al Shabab - Al-Qadisiyah FC | 1 - 3 | L |
| 03.08.2026 | Al Shabab - MC Alger | 0 - 0 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.08.2026 | Al Shabab - Al Riyadh | 3 - 3 | D |
| 21.08.2026 | Al Riyadh - Al-Nassr | 0 - 4 | L |
| 17.08.2026 | Al Zulfi - Al Riyadh | 0 - 2 | W |
| 14.08.2026 | Al-Ettifaq - Al Riyadh | 4 - 2 | L |
| 21.05.2026 | Al Riyadh - Al Okhdood | 1 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Al Shabab and Al Riyadh is scheduled for 25.08.2026 18:00 in Pro League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Al Shabab are in position 16 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is L. Al Riyadh are in position 15 with 0 points. The stored form sequence is L.
Al Shabab recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLLLWLLLDL. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 2.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al Riyadh recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLWDWLLLW. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 2.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 7 head-to-head matches, Al Shabab recorded 5 wins, there were 2 draws, and Al Riyadh recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2.86 goals per match. Both teams scored in 71.4% of those matches, while 57.1% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Al Shabab -1.5 / Al Riyadh +1.5 supports Al Shabab by an average 1.14 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 15, score 80/100, 80.16% group success rate across 2742 observations).
The discipline profile for Al Shabab at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 2.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 2 completed matches (100.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Al Riyadh away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 2.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 2 of 2 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Al Shabab and Al Riyadh ended 3-3. The game produced 6 goals in total. The first half contained 4 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 7 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.86 goals, while this match produced 6. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 71.4%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Al Shabab at home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 2 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Al Shabab received 0 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 0 in total. That was 2 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Al Riyadh away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 1 yellow cards, 1 red cards and 2 total cards per match. In this game, Al Riyadh received 2 yellow cards and 1 red cards, 3 in total. That was 1 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 100%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Al Shabab at -1.5. The stored market movement was 1.14 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 3-3, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 15. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.