Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 31.03.2018 | Hibernian - Partick | 2 : 0 |
| 02.12.2017 | Partick - Hibernian | 0 : 1 |
| 05.08.2017 | Hibernian - Partick | 3 : 1 |
| 03.05.2014 | Hibernian - Partick | 1 : 1 |
| 15.03.2014 | Partick - Hibernian | 3 : 1 |
| 07.12.2013 | Hibernian - Partick | 1 : 1 |
| 07.10.2013 | Partick - Hibernian | 0 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.08.2026 | Shkendija - Hibernian | 0 - 0 | D |
| 09.08.2026 | Rangers - Hibernian | 1 - 2 | W |
| 06.08.2026 | Hibernian - Shkendija | 2 - 1 | W |
| 02.08.2026 | Hibernian - Motherwell | 1 - 2 | L |
| 30.07.2026 | Hibernian - Malisheva | 4 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.08.2026 | Partick - Livingston | 2 - 0 | W |
| 01.08.2026 | Morton - Partick | 0 - 1 | W |
| 26.07.2026 | Clydebank - Partick | 2 - 2 | D |
| 21.07.2026 | Partick - Stenhousemuir | 2 - 2 | D |
| 18.07.2026 | Livingston - Partick | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Hibernian and Partick is scheduled for 16.08.2026 13:00 in League Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Hibernian recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWWLWLWWLL. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals. Partick recorded 4 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWDDDWWDLD. The averages are 1.90 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 7 head-to-head matches, Hibernian recorded 4 wins, there were 2 draws, and Partick recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.29 goals per match. Both teams scored in 57.1% of those matches, while 28.6% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Hibernian to win with 61% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 60.98%, 24.39% and 14.63%. The model momentum difference is 46.34 points in favour of Hibernian. The input data quality score is 95/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.50 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -8.54%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Hibernian -0.25 / Partick +0.25 supports Partick by an average 3.43 percentage points across 2 bookmakers (Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 6 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2). Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.22, score 77/100, 77.30% bucket win rate across 370 observations).
The discipline profile for Partick away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 4 completed matches (25.0% coverage).
The match between Hibernian and Partick ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 7 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.29 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 71.4%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Partick away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 1 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1 total cards per match. In this game, Partick received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 1 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Partick at +0.25. The stored market movement was 3.43 percentage points across 2 bookmakers. At the final score of 1-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Odd. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.22. The actual market outcome was Under 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 6 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.