Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 02.05.2026 | Al Ula - Al-Raed | 2 : 1 |
| 07.01.2026 | Al-Raed - Al Ula | 3 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.08.2026 | Al Anwar - Al Ula | 0 - 1 | W |
| 23.08.2026 | Al Ula - Al Jabalain | 3 - 1 | W |
| 19.08.2026 | Al Ula - Al-Fateh | 3 - 0 | W |
| 31.07.2026 | Crystal Palace - Al Ula | 3 - 1 | L |
| 23.05.2026 | Al Diriyah - Al Ula | 2 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.08.2026 | Al-Raed - Hajer | 2 - 3 | L |
| 22.08.2026 | Al Orubah - Al-Raed | 0 - 1 | W |
| 17.08.2026 | Al-Raed - Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 0 - 2 | L |
| 13.05.2026 | Al-Raed - Abha | 5 - 1 | W |
| 09.05.2026 | Al Zulfi - Al-Raed | 2 - 2 | D |
The upcoming match between Al Ula and Al-Raed is scheduled for 02.09.2026 17:40 in Division 1. The listed venue is Prince Mohammed bin Abdul Aziz Stadium, Medina. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Al Ula are in position 2 with 6 points. The stored form sequence is WW. Al-Raed are in position 7 with 3 points. The stored form sequence is LW.
Al Ula recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWLLWWWWW. The averages are 2.10 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al-Raed recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLWDLLWLW. The averages are 1.70 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 2 head-to-head matches, Al Ula recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and Al-Raed recorded 1 wins. The average total was 4 goals per match. Both teams scored in 100% of those matches, while 100% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 100%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Al Ula or draw (1X) with 82% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 58.57%, 23.28% and 18.16%. The model momentum difference is 40.41 points in favour of Al Ula. The input data quality score is 95/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.10 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -9.97%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
3 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.20, score 80/100, 80.23% bucket win rate across 531 observations). At least one goal in the match (quota 11.80, score 85/100, 85% group success rate across 120 observations). Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.70).
The match between Al Ula and Al-Raed ended 2-0. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.2. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 11.8. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.7. The actual market outcome was BTTS No. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.