Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Imortal Albufeira - Lagoa | 1 - 0 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | Imortal Albufeira - 1º Dezembro | 5 - 0 | W |
| 16.08.2026 | Imortal Albufeira - Sacavenense | 0 - 0 | D |
| 06.04.2024 | Sintrense - Imortal Albufeira | 1 - 1 | D |
| 24.03.2024 | Imortal Albufeira - Vasco da Gama Vidigueira | 1 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23.08.2026 | Imortal Albufeira - Lagoa | 1 - 0 | L |
| 16.08.2026 | Aljustrelense - Lagoa | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.04.2026 | Lagoa - Alcochetense | 1 - 2 | L |
| 12.04.2026 | Portimonense B - Lagoa | 1 - 3 | W |
| 04.04.2026 | Oriental Lisboa - Lagoa | 0 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between Imortal Albufeira and Lagoa is scheduled for 23.08.2026 16:00 in Campeonato de Portugal Prio - Group D. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Imortal Albufeira recorded 1 wins, 3 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDLLLLLDDL. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Lagoa recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWWDLWLWL. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Imortal Albufeira and Lagoa ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.