Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.09.2026 | Crystal Palace - Ipswich | 2 - 3 | L |
| 08.09.2026 | Crystal Palace - Middlesbrough | 3 - 0 | W |
| 05.09.2026 | Fulham - Crystal Palace | 2 - 3 | W |
| 28.08.2026 | Crystal Palace - Manchester City | 1 - 4 | L |
| 22.08.2026 | Everton - Crystal Palace | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.09.2026 | Al Ula - Jeddah Club | 3 - 0 | W |
| 08.09.2026 | Damac - Al Ula | 0 - 1 | W |
| 02.09.2026 | Al Ula - Al-Raed | 2 - 0 | W |
| 28.08.2026 | Al Anwar - Al Ula | 0 - 1 | W |
| 23.08.2026 | Al Ula - Al Jabalain | 3 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Crystal Palace and Al Ula is scheduled for 31.07.2026 18:45. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Crystal Palace recorded 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWLDLDWLW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al Ula recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWWWWLWW. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 1.10 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Crystal Palace to win with 71% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 70.78%, 17.98% and 11.24%. The model momentum difference is 59.55 points in favour of Crystal Palace. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.27 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.10%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 21, score 84/100, 84.40% group success rate across 891 observations).
The match between Crystal Palace and Al Ula ended 3-1. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 21. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.