Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 29.03.2026 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 4 : 3 |
| 14.09.2025 | Aston Villa W - Chelsea W | 1 : 3 |
| 02.02.2025 | Aston Villa W - Chelsea W | 0 : 1 |
| 20.09.2024 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 1 : 0 |
| 17.04.2024 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 3 : 0 |
| 04.11.2023 | Aston Villa W - Chelsea W | 0 : 6 |
| 16.04.2023 | Aston Villa W - Chelsea W | 0 : 1 |
| 02.04.2023 | Aston Villa W - Chelsea W | 0 : 3 |
| 30.10.2022 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 3 : 1 |
| 13.03.2022 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02.09.2026 | Real Sociedad W - Chelsea W | 0 - 1 | W |
| 26.08.2026 | Chelsea W - Real Sociedad W | 5 - 2 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Chelsea W - Manchester United W | 1 - 0 | W |
| 10.05.2026 | Chelsea W - Manchester City W | 2 - 3 | L |
| 03.05.2026 | Leicester City WFC - Chelsea W | 1 - 3 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.05.2026 | London City Lionesses - Aston Villa W | 2 - 1 | L |
| 09.05.2026 | Aston Villa W - Arsenal W | 0 - 3 | L |
| 04.05.2026 | Aston Villa W - West Ham W | 0 - 2 | L |
| 29.03.2026 | Chelsea W - Aston Villa W | 4 - 3 | L |
| 22.03.2026 | Leicester City WFC - Aston Villa W | 1 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between Chelsea W and Aston Villa W is scheduled for 05.09.2026 11:30 in FA WSL. The listed venue is Stamford Bridge, London. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Chelsea W recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWLWWWWWL. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Aston Villa W recorded 1 wins, 1 draws and 8 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLWDLLLL. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 2.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Chelsea W recorded 10 wins, there were 0 draws, and Aston Villa W recorded 0 wins. The average total was 3.10 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 9.80; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Chelsea W to win with 69% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 69.28%, 17.55% and 13.16%. The model momentum difference is 56.12 points in favour of Chelsea W. The input data quality score is 94/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.33 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -7.85%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Chelsea W +0.25 / Aston Villa W -0.25 supports Aston Villa W by an average 5.10 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (Bet365) with up to 3 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Chelsea W and Aston Villa W ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.1 goals, while this match produced 2. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Chelsea W at +0.25. The stored market movement was 5.1 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 1-1, the line settled as a half win. The Asian-handicap signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.