Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17.08.2026 | Iraklis 1908 - Volos NFC | 1 - 3 | L |
| 06.08.2026 | Cremonese - Iraklis 1908 | - | |
| 02.08.2026 | Parma - Iraklis 1908 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 29.07.2026 | Palermo - Iraklis 1908 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 25.07.2026 | Bologna - Iraklis 1908 | 2 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17.08.2026 | Iraklis 1908 - Volos NFC | 1 - 3 | W |
| 10.08.2026 | Volos NFC - Kalamata | 0 - 2 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Heerenveen - Volos NFC | 3 - 2 | L |
| 01.08.2026 | Heracles - Volos NFC | - | |
| 28.07.2026 | Cambuur - Volos NFC | 1 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between Iraklis 1908 and Volos NFC is scheduled for 17.08.2026 18:00 in Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Iraklis 1908 recorded 5 wins, 4 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DDLWDDWWWW. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 0.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 20% of those matches, while 0% finished with over 2.5 goals. Volos NFC recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLWDLLLLLD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 2.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 1.87). Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The match between Iraklis 1908 and Volos NFC ended 1-3. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 1.87. The actual market outcome was BTTS Yes. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.