Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 16.05.2026 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 1 : 3 |
| 09.01.2026 | Khalidiya - Al Najma | 3 : 0 |
| 16.05.2025 | Khalidiya - Al Najma | 2 : 1 |
| 18.01.2025 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 1 : 3 |
| 22.04.2024 | Khalidiya - Al Najma | 4 : 1 |
| 08.11.2023 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 1 : 1 |
| 09.04.2022 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 0 : 0 |
| 10.01.2022 | Khalidiya - Al Najma | 3 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.08.2026 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 2 - 7 | L |
| 30.05.2026 | Al Najma - Manama | 3 - 2 | W |
| 25.05.2026 | Budaiya - Al Najma | 0 - 3 | W |
| 21.05.2026 | Al Najma - Al Ittihad | 2 - 1 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 1 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.08.2026 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 2 - 7 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Al Najma - Khalidiya | 1 - 3 | W |
| 11.05.2026 | Khalidiya - Muharraq | 1 - 2 | L |
| 03.05.2026 | Budaiya - Khalidiya | 0 - 1 | W |
| 27.04.2026 | Khalidiya - Al-Hidd | 2 - 1 | W |
The upcoming match between Al Najma and Khalidiya is scheduled for 27.08.2026 16:00 in Premier League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Al Najma recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWLWLLLDW. The averages are 1.60 goals scored and 1.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals. Khalidiya recorded 8 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WLWWWDWWWW. The averages are 2.40 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 8 head-to-head matches, Al Najma recorded 0 wins, there were 2 draws, and Khalidiya recorded 6 wins. The average total was 3 goals per match. Both teams scored in 62.5% of those matches, while 75% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 70%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Khalidiya to win with 69% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 11.20%, 19.90% and 68.90%. The model momentum difference is 57.70 points in favour of Khalidiya. The input data quality score is 95/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.30 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -10.43%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Goals Over/Under — Over 1.5 (odds 1.22, score 74/100, 74.19% bucket win rate across 496 observations). At least one goal in the match (quota 12, score 77/100, 77.30% group success rate across 1304 observations).
The match between Al Najma and Khalidiya ended 2-7. The game produced 9 goals in total. The first half contained 5 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 8 head-to-head meetings averaged 3 goals, while this match produced 9. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 62.5%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 8 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Over 1.5 FT at odds of 1.22. The actual market outcome was Over 1.5 FT. The Premium signal was confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 12. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.