Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 27.03.2026 | Kortrijk U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 2 : 1 |
| 05.09.2025 | RFC de Liege U21 - Kortrijk U21 | 0 : 7 |
| 07.02.2025 | Kortrijk U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 5 : 1 |
| 01.11.2024 | RFC de Liege U21 - Kortrijk U21 | 1 : 2 |
| 06.09.2024 | Kortrijk U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 3 : 4 |
| 26.01.2024 | RFC de Liege U21 - Kortrijk U21 | 0 : 2 |
| 18.09.2023 | Kortrijk U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.2026 | Waasland-Beveren U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 6 - 0 | L |
| 28.08.2026 | RFC de Liege U21 - RFC Seraing Reserve U21 | 1 - 2 | L |
| 15.05.2026 | RFC de Liege U21 - Westerlo U21 | 0 - 7 | L |
| 08.05.2026 | Lommel U21 - RFC de Liege U21 | 3 - 0 | L |
| 24.04.2026 | RFC de Liege U21 - RFC Seraing Reserve U21 | 1 - 5 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04.09.2026 | Kortrijk U21 - K. Beerschot V.A. Reserve U21 | 1 - 0 | W |
| 15.05.2026 | Sporting Charleroi II - Kortrijk U21 | 0 - 2 | W |
| 08.05.2026 | Kortrijk U21 - Patro Eisden U21 | 5 - 0 | W |
| 24.04.2026 | Waasland-Beveren U21 - Kortrijk U21 | 2 - 4 | W |
| 20.04.2026 | Kortrijk U21 - Francs Borains U21 | 5 - 2 | W |
The upcoming match between RFC de Liege U21 and Kortrijk U21 is scheduled for 11.09.2026 18:00 in Reserve Pro League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
RFC de Liege U21 recorded 0 wins, 0 draws and 10 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLLLLLLLL. The averages are 0.70 goals scored and 3.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals. Kortrijk U21 recorded 8 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWLWWWWL. The averages are 2.90 goals scored and 0.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 7 head-to-head matches, RFC de Liege U21 recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and Kortrijk U21 recorded 6 wins. The average total was 4.14 goals per match. Both teams scored in 57.1% of those matches, while 71.4% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 3.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Kortrijk U21 to win with 88% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 4.86%, 7.11% and 88.03%. The model momentum difference is 83.16 points in favour of Kortrijk U21. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.05 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -7.57%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
2 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Both Teams Score — Yes (odds 2.30). At least one goal in the match (quota 23, score 79/100, 79.36% group success rate across 717 observations).
The discipline profile for RFC de Liege U21 at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 2 completed matches (50.0% coverage).
The match between RFC de Liege U21 and Kortrijk U21 ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 7 head-to-head meetings averaged 4.14 goals, while this match produced 1. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 57.1%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 7 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 71.4%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was BTTS Yes at odds of 2.3. The actual market outcome was BTTS No. The Premium signal was not confirmed. The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 23. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 11 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 9 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.