Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.03.2026 | Zamalek SC - Al Ittihad | 1 : 0 |
| 01.01.2026 | Al Ittihad - Zamalek SC | 3 : 0 |
| 29.12.2024 | Zamalek SC - Al Ittihad | 2 : 0 |
| 27.05.2024 | Al Ittihad - Zamalek SC | 0 : 2 |
| 11.04.2024 | Zamalek SC - Al Ittihad | 3 : 0 |
| 05.06.2023 | Zamalek SC - Al Ittihad | 2 : 1 |
| 11.01.2023 | Al Ittihad - Zamalek SC | 0 : 0 |
| 23.08.2022 | Zamalek SC - Al Ittihad | 1 : 1 |
| 19.04.2022 | Al Ittihad - Zamalek SC | 0 : 2 |
| 10.08.2021 | Al Ittihad - Zamalek SC | 1 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.05.2026 | Zamalek SC - Ceramica Cleopatra | 1 - 0 | W |
| 16.05.2026 | Zamalek SC - USM Alger | 1 - 0 | W |
| 09.05.2026 | USM Alger - Zamalek SC | 1 - 0 | L |
| 05.05.2026 | Smouha SC - Zamalek SC | 0 - 1 | W |
| 01.05.2026 | Zamalek SC - Al Ahly | 0 - 3 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.05.2026 | National Bank of Egypt - Al Ittihad | 2 - 2 | D |
| 23.05.2026 | Al Ittihad - Ismaily SC | 3 - 0 | W |
| 18.05.2026 | Ghazl El Mehalla - Al Ittihad | 1 - 0 | L |
| 13.05.2026 | Al Ittihad - El Geish | 1 - 0 | W |
| 08.05.2026 | Future FC - Al Ittihad | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between Zamalek SC and Al Ittihad is scheduled for 21.08.2026 17:00 in Premier League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Zamalek SC recorded 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWLWLDWDWW. The averages are 0.90 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 10% of those matches, while 20% finished with over 2.5 goals. Al Ittihad recorded 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DWLWDLLDDW. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Zamalek SC recorded 7 wins, there were 2 draws, and Al Ittihad recorded 1 wins. The average total was 2.10 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%; Over 1.5 goals — 30%; Over 2.5 goals — 30%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 8.85; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 93%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Zamalek SC or draw (1X) with 86% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 59.81%, 26.39% and 13.80%. The model momentum difference is 46.01 points in favour of Zamalek SC. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.07 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -7.77%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2).
The match between Zamalek SC and Al Ittihad ended 0-0. The game produced 0 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 9 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.1 goals, while this match produced 0. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result aligned with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 90%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 8.85 total corners. The match recorded 9 corners in total. The result remained within one corner of the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 8.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 93%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2. The actual market outcome was Even. The Premium signal was not confirmed.
Of 12 verifiable pre-match indicators, 9 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.