Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 05.05.2026 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 3 : 0 |
| 12.12.2025 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 0 : 1 |
| 14.09.2025 | Enppi - Al Ahly | 1 : 1 |
| 20.03.2025 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 0 : 1 |
| 30.12.2024 | Enppi - Al Ahly | 0 : 0 |
| 14.08.2024 | Enppi - Al Ahly | 1 : 1 |
| 08.04.2024 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 2 : 2 |
| 04.10.2023 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 3 : 0 |
| 23.05.2023 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 2 : 0 |
| 05.01.2023 | Enppi - Al Ahly | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.08.2026 | Barcelona - Al Ahly | 2 - 1 | L |
| 20.05.2026 | AL Masry - Al Ahly | 0 - 2 | W |
| 05.05.2026 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 3 - 0 | W |
| 01.05.2026 | Zamalek SC - Al Ahly | 0 - 3 | W |
| 27.04.2026 | Pyramids FC - Al Ahly | 3 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.06.2026 | Enppi - AL Masry | 0 - 3 | L |
| 01.06.2026 | Wadi Degla - Enppi | 0 - 1 | W |
| 25.05.2026 | Enppi - Wadi Degla | 0 - 0 | D |
| 05.05.2026 | Al Ahly - Enppi | 3 - 0 | L |
| 01.05.2026 | Pyramids FC - Enppi | 3 - 2 | L |
The upcoming match between Al Ahly and Enppi is scheduled for 23.08.2026 17:00 in Premier League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Al Ahly recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWLWDLLL. The averages are 1.50 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Enppi recorded 2 wins, 4 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDLLDDDWL. The averages are 0.80 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 10 head-to-head matches, Al Ahly recorded 4 wins, there were 4 draws, and Enppi recorded 2 wins. The average total was 2 goals per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 10.28; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Al Ahly or draw (1X) with 86% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 59.93%, 25.68% and 14.38%. The model momentum difference is 45.55 points in favour of Al Ahly. The input data quality score is 95/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.08 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -7.53%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Al Ahly 0 / Enppi 0 supports Enppi by an average 2.72 percentage points across 3 bookmakers (Pinnacle, Bet365, 1xBet) with up to 9 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
The match between Al Ahly and Enppi ended 3-2. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 8 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 10 head-to-head meetings averaged 2 goals, while this match produced 5. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 10 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 10.28 total corners. The match recorded 8 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 8.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 9.5 corners. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Enppi at 0. The stored market movement was 2.72 percentage points across 3 bookmakers. At the final score of 3-2, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
Of 13 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 9 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.