Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 28.11.2025 | Shams Azar Qazvin - Persepolis FC | 1 : 2 |
| 30.03.2025 | Shams Azar Qazvin - Persepolis FC | 3 : 2 |
| 26.10.2024 | Persepolis FC - Shams Azar Qazvin | 2 : 0 |
| 28.05.2024 | Shams Azar Qazvin - Persepolis FC | 1 : 3 |
| 24.12.2023 | Persepolis FC - Shams Azar Qazvin | 2 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.03.2026 | Sepahan FC - Shams Azar Qazvin | - | |
| 27.02.2026 | Shams Azar Qazvin - Foolad FC | 0 - 2 | L |
| 20.02.2026 | Fajr Sepasi - Shams Azar Qazvin | 1 - 0 | L |
| 13.02.2026 | Shams Azar Qazvin - Aluminium Arak | 0 - 0 | D |
| 05.02.2026 | Esteghlal FC - Shams Azar Qazvin | 3 - 2 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.03.2026 | Persepolis FC - Tractor Sazi | - | |
| 28.02.2026 | ZOB Ahan - Persepolis FC | - | |
| 20.02.2026 | Persepolis FC - Kheybar Khorramabad | 1 - 2 | L |
| 14.02.2026 | Gol Gohar - Persepolis FC | 3 - 1 | L |
| 08.02.2026 | Malavan - Persepolis FC | 1 - 0 | L |
The upcoming match between Shams Azar Qazvin and Persepolis FC is scheduled for 15.08.2026 16:00 in Persian Gulf Pro League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Shams Azar Qazvin recorded 2 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLDLWWDDDD. The averages are 0.50 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 10% of those matches, while 10% finished with over 2.5 goals. Persepolis FC recorded 4 wins, 1 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLWLWLWDW. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.30 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 5 head-to-head matches, Shams Azar Qazvin recorded 1 wins, there were 0 draws, and Persepolis FC recorded 4 wins. The average total was 3.40 goals per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 1.5 goals — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as draw or Persepolis FC (X2) with 84% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 15.51%, 27.31% and 57.18%. The model momentum difference is 41.68 points in favour of Persepolis FC. The input data quality score is 75/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.12 with Betano. The stored estimated EV is -5.37%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The match between Shams Azar Qazvin and Persepolis FC ended 0-2. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 5 head-to-head meetings averaged 3.4 goals, while this match produced 2. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 80%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 5 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Over 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Under 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.