Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 26.08.2025 | Queens Park Rangers U21 - Fleetwood Town U21 | 2 : 2 |
| 15.04.2025 | Queens Park Rangers U21 - Fleetwood Town U21 | 1 : 1 |
| 04.09.2023 | Queens Park Rangers U21 - Fleetwood Town U21 | 2 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | Blackburn Rovers U21 - Queens Park Rangers U21 | 4 - 2 | L |
| 01.09.2026 | Huddersfield Town U21 - Queens Park Rangers U21 | 3 - 1 | L |
| 25.08.2026 | Queens Park Rangers U21 - Hull City U21 | 3 - 3 | D |
| 18.08.2026 | Peterborough United U21 - Queens Park Rangers U21 | 2 - 0 | L |
| 14.08.2026 | Queens Park Rangers U21 - Bolton Wanderers Res. | 4 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.09.2026 | Fleetwood Town U21 - Burnley U21 | 1 - 2 | L |
| 01.09.2026 | Fleetwood Town U21 - Millwall U21 | 1 - 0 | W |
| 25.08.2026 | Coventry City U21 - Fleetwood Town U21 | 1 - 2 | W |
| 18.08.2026 | Fleetwood Town U21 - Preston North End U21 | 1 - 2 | L |
| 14.08.2026 | Fleetwood Town U21 - Colchester United U21 | 0 - 4 | L |
The upcoming match between Queens Park Rangers U21 and Fleetwood Town U21 is scheduled for 13.09.2026 12:00 in Professional Development League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Queens Park Rangers U21 are in position 15 with 1 points after 3 matches. The season record is 0 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses. The goals record is 4 scored and 8 conceded. The stored form sequence is LDL. Fleetwood Town U21 are in position 5 with 6 points after 3 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 3 scored and 5 conceded. The stored form sequence is WWL.
Queens Park Rangers U21 recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLDLWLWDWL. The averages are 2.20 goals scored and 2.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. Fleetwood Town U21 recorded 3 wins, 0 draws and 7 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWLLLLLLW. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 2.90 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 80% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 3 head-to-head matches, Queens Park Rangers U21 recorded 1 wins, there were 2 draws, and Fleetwood Town U21 recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2.67 goals per match. Both teams scored in 66.7% of those matches, while 33.3% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 20, score 87/100, 86.57% group success rate across 201 observations).
The match between Queens Park Rangers U21 and Fleetwood Town U21 ended 4-1. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 3 head-to-head meetings averaged 2.67 goals, while this match produced 5. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 3 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 20. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 9 verifiable pre-match indicators, 5 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.