Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Prato - Ternana | 1 - 0 | W |
| 05.08.2026 | Prato - Empoli | 0 - 0 | D |
| 17.05.2026 | Seravezza - Prato | 1 - 2 | W |
| 10.05.2026 | Prato - Robur Siena | 3 - 1 | W |
| 03.05.2026 | Prato - Montevarchi Calcio | 1 - 0 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Prato - Ternana | 1 - 0 | L |
| 03.05.2026 | Pianese - Ternana | 1 - 1 | D |
| 26.04.2026 | Ternana - Pianese | 1 - 3 | L |
| 18.04.2026 | Bra - Ternana | 1 - 2 | W |
| 12.04.2026 | Ternana - Perugia | 2 - 2 | D |
The upcoming match between Prato and Ternana is scheduled for 06.09.2026 13:00 in Serie D - Girone E. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Prato are in position 4 with 0 points. Ternana are in position 2 with 0 points.
Prato recorded 9 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWWWWWWWD. The averages are 1.90 goals scored and 0.50 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Ternana recorded 2 wins, 4 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DLWDLDDLLW. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 80% of those matches, while 50% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Under 3.5 goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 50%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Prato and Ternana ended 1-0. The game produced 1 goal in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 5 verifiable pre-match indicators, 2 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.