Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 05.05.2026 | Naft - Al-Karma | 0 : 0 |
| 20.09.2025 | Al-Karma - Naft | 2 : 1 |
| 02.04.2025 | Naft - Al-Karma | 0 : 0 |
| 26.09.2024 | Al-Karma - Naft | 0 : 2 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | Al-Karma - Naft | 3 - 0 | W |
| 03.09.2026 | Diyala - Al-Karma | 1 - 2 | W |
| 30.08.2026 | Al-Karma - Karbala | 2 - 0 | W |
| 26.08.2026 | Al Kahrabaa - Al-Karma | 1 - 1 | D |
| 21.08.2026 | Al-Karma - Al Shorta | 2 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | Al-Karma - Naft | 3 - 0 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | Al Minaa Basra - Naft | 0 - 3 | W |
| 31.08.2026 | Al Talaba - Naft | 0 - 0 | D |
| 26.08.2026 | Naft - Duhok | 1 - 1 | D |
| 20.08.2026 | Naft Maysan - Naft | 0 - 0 | D |
The upcoming match between Al-Karma and Naft is scheduled for 09.09.2026 19:00 in Iraqi League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Al-Karma are in position 2 with 11 points. The stored form sequence is WWDWD. Naft are in position 4 with 9 points. The stored form sequence is WDDDW.
Al-Karma recorded 5 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWDWDWDDWD. The averages are 1.40 goals scored and 0.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 60% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Naft recorded 4 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDDDWWWDDL. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 4 head-to-head matches, Al-Karma recorded 1 wins, there were 2 draws, and Naft recorded 1 wins. The average total was 1.25 goals per match. Both teams scored in 25% of those matches, while 25% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 100%; Under 2.5 goals — 80%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 50%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Al-Karma or draw (1X) with 82% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 53.88%, 28.12% and 18.00%. The model momentum difference is 35.89 points in favour of Al-Karma. The input data quality score is 96/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.11 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -8.98%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Al-Karma -0.25 / Naft +0.25 supports Naft by an average 1.79 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (1xBet) with up to 4 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. Odd/Even — Odd (odds 2.02).
The match between Al-Karma and Naft ended 3-0. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The previous 4 head-to-head meetings averaged 1.25 goals, while this match produced 3. The final scoring profile differed by more than one goal from that average. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was No BTTS. The final result aligned with that historical profile. Across the previous 4 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 75%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 100%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Naft at +0.25. The stored market movement was 1.79 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 3-0, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was Odd at odds of 2.02. The actual market outcome was Odd. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 6 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.