Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 27.06.2025 | Karbala - Naft | 2 : 4 |
| 03.02.2025 | Naft - Karbala | 1 : 0 |
| 31.05.2024 | Naft - Karbala | 1 : 1 |
| 05.12.2023 | Karbala - Naft | 0 : 2 |
| 16.07.2023 | Karbala - Naft | 0 : 0 |
| 24.02.2023 | Naft - Karbala | 1 : 0 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | Al-Karma - Naft | 3 - 0 | L |
| 05.09.2026 | Al Minaa Basra - Naft | 0 - 3 | W |
| 31.08.2026 | Al Talaba - Naft | 0 - 0 | D |
| 26.08.2026 | Naft - Duhok | 1 - 1 | D |
| 20.08.2026 | Naft Maysan - Naft | 0 - 0 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.09.2026 | Karbala - Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 2 - 3 | L |
| 04.09.2026 | Karbala - Al Karkh | 1 - 0 | W |
| 30.08.2026 | Al-Karma - Karbala | 2 - 0 | L |
| 26.08.2026 | Mosul - Karbala | 3 - 0 | L |
| 21.08.2026 | Karbala - Al Zawra'a | 1 - 1 | D |
The upcoming match between Naft and Karbala is scheduled for 14.09.2026 15:45 in Iraqi League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Standings and season form
Naft are in position 5 with 9 points after 6 matches. The season record is 2 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses. The goals record is 6 scored and 4 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWDDD. Karbala are in position 16 with 5 points after 6 matches. The season record is 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses. The goals record is 5 scored and 10 conceded. The stored form sequence is LWLLD.
Naft recorded 4 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWDDDWWWDD. The averages are 1.10 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 30% finished with over 2.5 goals. Karbala recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 6 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLLDDWLLL. The averages are 1 goals scored and 1.80 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
Across the last 6 head-to-head matches, Naft recorded 4 wins, there were 2 draws, and Karbala recorded 0 wins. The average total was 2 goals per match. Both teams scored in 33.3% of those matches, while 16.7% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Under 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 50%; Both teams to score — 30%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The discipline profile for Naft at home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 6 completed matches (16.7% coverage). The discipline profile for Karbala away from home is based on 1 matches. The team averages 0.00 yellow cards, 1.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 100.0%. Season card data is available for 1 of 6 completed matches (16.7% coverage).
The match between Naft and Karbala ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
The historical profile from 6 head-to-head meetings averaged 2 goals, while this match produced 3. The result remained within one goal of the historical average. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was No BTTS at 66.7%. The actual outcome for this indicator was BTTS. The final result did not align with that historical profile. Across the previous 6 head-to-head meetings, the leading historical direction was Under 2.5 at 83.3%. The actual outcome for this indicator was Over 2.5. The final result did not align with that historical profile.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Naft at home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 0 yellow cards, 1 red cards and 1 total cards per match. In this game, Naft received 0 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 0 in total. That was 1 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 100%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Karbala away from home was based on 1 matches, with averages of 0 yellow cards, 1 red cards and 1 total cards per match. In this game, Karbala received 0 yellow cards and 1 red cards, 1 in total. The total was effectively equal to the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 100%.
Of 8 verifiable pre-match indicators, 4 aligned with the final result and 4 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.