Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.11.2026 | Viking - KFUM Oslo | 5 - 1 | W |
| 04.11.2026 | Viking - Sabah FA | 4 - 1 | W |
| 30.10.2026 | Bodo/Glimt - Viking | 3 - 2 | L |
| 28.10.2026 | Viking - KFUM Oslo | 0 - 0 | D |
| 25.10.2026 | Viking - Tromso | 3 - 1 | W |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.11.2026 | Sabah FA - Keshla FC | 2 - 2 | D |
| 04.11.2026 | Viking - Sabah FA | 4 - 1 | L |
| 30.10.2026 | Turan - Sabah FA | 3 - 2 | L |
| 25.10.2026 | Sabah FA - Qarabag | 0 - 0 | D |
| 20.10.2026 | Sabah FA - Borussia Dortmund | 1 - 2 | L |
The upcoming match between Viking and Sabah FA is scheduled for 04.11.2026 20:00 in UEFA Champions League. The listed venue is Lyse Arena, Stavanger. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Viking recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLWDWWWWL. The averages are 2.90 goals scored and 1.60 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 90% finished with over 2.5 goals. Sabah FA recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDLWWDWWLW. The averages are 2 goals scored and 1 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 30% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 80%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%; Both teams to score — 50%. The stored corner indicators are: average total corners — 12.50; over 7.5 corners — 100%; over 8.5 corners — 100%; over 9.5 corners — 100%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The PMV3 model classifies the leading outcome as Viking to win with 67% confidence. The stored fair probabilities for home, draw and away are 66.87%, 18.72% and 14.40%. The model momentum difference is 52.47 points in favour of Viking. The input data quality score is 100/100. The stored price for the selected market is 1.40 with Bet365. The stored estimated EV is -6.38%. Despite the model probability, the price is marked NO_VALUE. The signal is therefore not treated automatically as a value bet.
The normalized movement for the Asian pair Viking +0.5 / Sabah FA -0.5 supports Sabah FA by an average 1.20 percentage points across 1 bookmakers (Bet365) with up to 2 stored observations. This is a market signal, not a result guarantee.
1 active football Premium signals are stored for this fixture. At least one goal in the match (quota 23, score 79/100, 79.15% group success rate across 1012 observations).
The discipline profile for Viking at home is based on 2 matches. The team averages 3.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 3.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 100.0%, 100.0%, 50.0%, 50.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 5 of 5 completed matches (100.0% coverage). The discipline profile for Sabah FA away from home is based on 5 matches. The team averages 1.00 yellow cards, 0.00 red cards and 1.00 total cards per match. At least 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cards were recorded in 80.0%, 20.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% of those matches respectively, while a red card occurred in 0.0%. Season card data is available for 11 of 11 completed matches (100.0% coverage).
The match between Viking and Sabah FA ended 4-1. The game produced 5 goals in total. The first half contained 2 goals. The verified final statistics recorded 16 corners in total. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. The stored pre-match average was 12.5 total corners. The match recorded 16 corners in total. The result differed by more than one corner from the stored average. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 7.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 7.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 8.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 8.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 9.5 corners at 100%. The actual outcome was Over 9.5 corners. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Viking at home was based on 2 matches, with averages of 3 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 3 total cards per match. In this game, Viking received 2 yellow cards and 0 red cards, 2 in total. That was 1 cards below the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 50% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%. Before kickoff, the discipline profile for Sabah FA away from home was based on 5 matches, with averages of 1 yellow cards, 0 red cards and 1 total cards per match. In this game, Sabah FA received 2 yellow cards and 1 red cards, 3 in total. That was 2 cards above the stored average. In the pre-match sample, 3+ cards occurred in 0% of matches, 5+ in 0%, and a red card in 0%.
The Asian-handicap signal locked before kickoff supported Sabah FA at -0.5. The stored market movement was 1.2 percentage points across 1 bookmaker. At the final score of 4-1, the line settled as a full loss. The Asian-handicap signal was not confirmed.
The stored Premium market was At least one FT goal with quota 23. The actual market outcome was At least one FT goal. The Premium signal was confirmed.
Of 10 verifiable pre-match indicators, 8 aligned with the final result and 2 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.