Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Malaysia U20 - Laos U20 | 2 : 1 |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Malaysia U20 - Laos U20 | 2 - 1 | W |
| 03.09.2026 | Malaysia U20 - Australia U20 | 2 - 2 | D |
| 31.08.2026 | Indonesia U20 - Malaysia U20 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 29.09.2024 | Sri Lanka U20 - Malaysia U20 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 27.09.2024 | Malaysia U20 - Tajikistan U20 | 0 - 1 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06.09.2026 | Malaysia U20 - Laos U20 | 2 - 1 | L |
| 03.09.2026 | Laos U20 - Indonesia U20 | 0 - 3 | L |
| 31.08.2026 | Australia U20 - Laos U20 | 2 - 0 | L |
| 29.09.2024 | India U20 - Laos U20 | 2 - 0 | L |
| 27.09.2024 | Laos U20 - Mongolia U20 | 6 - 0 | W |
The upcoming match between Malaysia U20 and Laos U20 is scheduled for 06.09.2026 12:00 in AFC U20 Asian Cup. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Malaysia U20 recorded 1 wins, 4 draws and 1 losses across the last 6 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is DDDLDW. The averages are 0.83 goals scored and 0.83 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 33.3% finished with over 2.5 goals. Laos U20 recorded 1 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses across the last 5 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LLLWL. The averages are 1.20 goals scored and 3 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 0% of those matches, while 60% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Under 3.5 goals — 78%; Over 1.5 goals — 67%; Under 2.5 goals — 67%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 44%; Over 2.5 goals — 33%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Malaysia U20 and Laos U20 ended 2-1. The game produced 3 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated No BTTS at 78%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 67%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 67%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 78%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 56%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 78%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.