Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.09.2026 | Lille U19 - Real Betis U19 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 11.02.2025 | Internazionale U19 - Lille U19 | 3 - 1 | L |
| 11.12.2024 | Lille U19 - Sturm Graz U19 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 27.11.2024 | Bologna U19 - Lille U19 | 2 - 2 | D |
| 05.11.2024 | Lille U19 - Juventus U19 | 0 - 0 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08.09.2026 | Lille U19 - Real Betis U19 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 24.02.2026 | Internazionale U19 - Real Betis U19 | 5 - 3 | L |
| 04.02.2026 | Real Betis U19 - Tottenham Hotspur U19 | 5 - 1 | W |
| 10.12.2025 | Real Betis U19 - Porto U19 | 5 - 0 | W |
| 26.11.2025 | Porto U19 - Real Betis U19 | 0 - 4 | W |
The upcoming match between Lille U19 and Real Betis U19 is scheduled for 08.09.2026 13:00 in UEFA Youth League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Lille U19 recorded 1 wins, 5 draws and 1 losses across the last 7 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDDDWD. The averages are 1.29 goals scored and 1.43 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 85.7% of those matches, while 57.1% finished with over 2.5 goals. Real Betis U19 recorded 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWWWWLLDWW. The averages are 3 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 50% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 0.5 first-half goals — 90%; Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Both teams to score — 60%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Lille U19 and Real Betis U19 ended 0-0. The game produced 0 goals in total. The first half contained 0 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Under 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 0 aligned with the final result and 6 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.