Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.09.2026 | Como U19 - RB Leipzig U19 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 18.05.2026 | Como U19 - Empoli U19 | 4 - 1 | W |
| 09.05.2026 | Virtus Entella U19 - Como U19 | 2 - 2 | D |
| 02.05.2026 | Como U19 - Modena U19 | 1 - 3 | L |
| 25.04.2026 | Brescia U19 - Como U19 | 1 - 0 | L |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.09.2026 | Como U19 - RB Leipzig U19 | 1 - 1 | D |
| 22.08.2026 | RB Leipzig U19 - Erzgebirge Aue U19 | 7 - 1 | W |
| 19.08.2026 | Greuther Fürth U19 - RB Leipzig U19 | 0 - 2 | W |
| 15.08.2026 | RB Leipzig U19 - Dynamo Dresden U19 | 4 - 2 | W |
| 07.08.2026 | Rot-Weiß Erfurt U19 - RB Leipzig U19 | 2 - 1 | L |
The upcoming match between Como U19 and RB Leipzig U19 is scheduled for 10.09.2026 13:00 in UEFA Youth League. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
Como U19 recorded 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WDLLWWDWWL. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 1.40 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals. RB Leipzig U19 recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is WWWLLLDWLW. The averages are 2.50 goals scored and 1.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 70% of those matches, while 70% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 90%; Over 0.5 first-half goals — 80%; Both teams to score — 70%; Over 2.5 goals — 70%; Over 1.5 first-half goals — 60%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between Como U19 and RB Leipzig U19 ended 1-1. The game produced 2 goals in total. The first half contained 1 goal. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 70%. The actual outcome was BTTS. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 2.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Under 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 0.5 HT at 80%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 HT at 60%. The actual outcome was Under 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 3 aligned with the final result and 3 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.