Strictly Necessary
Required for login, session management, account security, device limits, referral functionality and remembering your cookie choice.
| Date | Match | Score |
|---|
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | CSA U20 - Confiança PB U20 | 4 - 0 | W |
| 09.01.2026 | Inter Limeira U20 - CSA U20 | 3 - 1 | L |
| 06.01.2026 | CSA U20 - Bahia U20 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 03.01.2026 | América-SP U20 - CSA U20 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 31.08.2025 | CSA U20 - CSE U20 | 1 - 1 | D |
| Date | Match | Score | Res |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09.09.2026 | CSA U20 - Confiança PB U20 | 4 - 0 | L |
| 14.06.2026 | Confiança PB U20 - Queimadense U20 | 2 - 3 | L |
| 06.06.2026 | Sport PB U20 - Confiança PB U20 | 0 - 0 | D |
| 10.01.2026 | AD Centro Olímpico U20 - Confiança PB U20 | 0 - 2 | W |
| 07.01.2026 | Confiança PB U20 - Fortaleza U20 | 2 - 4 | L |
The upcoming match between CSA U20 and Confiança PB U20 is scheduled for 09.09.2026 18:00 in Copa do Brasil U20. The analysis uses only stored statistics, form, head-to-head records, trend percentages and active Premium market signals. It does not guarantee a particular result.
CSA U20 recorded 4 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LDDDLWWDWW. The averages are 1.80 goals scored and 0.70 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals. Confiança PB U20 recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses across the last 10 completed matches. The newest-to-oldest result sequence is LWLLWLWDWW. The averages are 1.30 goals scored and 1.20 goals conceded per match. Both teams scored in 40% of those matches, while 40% finished with over 2.5 goals.
The highest stored values are: Over 1.5 goals — 70%; Both teams to score — 60%; Under 2.5 goals — 60%; Under 3.5 goals — 60%; Over 2.5 goals — 40%. They are statistical indicators and are not automatically converted into a prediction.
The match between CSA U20 and Confiança PB U20 ended 4-0. The game produced 4 goals in total. The first half contained 3 goals. The following review compares the final result only with historical data, the discipline profile, trend values and Premium signals locked before kickoff.
Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated BTTS at 60%. The actual outcome was No BTTS. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Over 1.5 at 70%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5. The stored trend was confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 2.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 2.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 3.5 at 60%. The actual outcome was Over 3.5. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 0.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 0.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result. Before kickoff, the stored trend indicated Under 1.5 HT at 90%. The actual outcome was Over 1.5 HT. The stored trend was not confirmed by the result.
Of 6 verifiable pre-match indicators, 1 aligned with the final result and 5 were not confirmed. This is a post-match verification of data stored before kickoff, not a revision of the analysis after the match ended.